Welcome to JobSyntax Sign in | Join | Help
Search
in

who's working for you?

GretchenHuman Resource cover

Want to know why your HR department can’t generate great candidates for you?  Because HR people are not recruiters.  (I’ll spare you the soap box treatment for today, but Jobster's Dave Lefkow does a good job of explaining the rift between HR and recruiting in yesterday’s ERE article, Why They Hate Recruiting:  Is it time to secede from HR?)    

Case in point: Human Resources magazine recently published a list of “HR’s biggest movers and shakers". Their words, not mine.  I’m still cringing at the thought of a HR person movin’ and shakin’.  Yikes.  Anyway, the magazine lists HR’s Top 100 Most Influential People. 1-49 are here, and 50-100 are here.  

Only three people on the list seem to have any current expertise or involvement in the recruiting function … and all three were in the bottom 50.

Now, I’m no HR expert, but I do consider myself fairly entreched in my professional field (which is considered by most to be a facet of HR), yet I didn’t recognize a single name on that top 100 list.   Recruiting has a very strong community – both on and offline – from whom I’ve learned so much.   These people – many who write blogs, publish newsletters, and speak at conferences – are my influentials.  Agree with them or not, the Gerry Crispins, Mark Mehlers, John Sumsers, Kevin Wheelers, and – heaven forbid – even the Recruiting Edges ;-) of the world are the ones who teach me.  I would have loved to have seen a community-involved leader – in corporate recruiting, consulting, training, acadamia, headhunting, technology … it doesn’t matter – highlighted.   I don't know.  Maybe I'm just part of the "new generation" … who knows. :)

I don’t expect a HR focused magazine to profile recruiting leaders, and I don’t really care.  :) But I highlight this as an open question out to hiring managers of the world.  Who’s recruiting for you:  a recruiter or a HR person?  If you need to hire top talent, the distinction is important.  Make sure the person doing your recruiting is a true recruiter.

gretchen

(Human Resources magazine knowledge via Jason and Gautam.  Otherwise, I don’t typically follow “HR” trends ;-)

today's emotion:  zesty

Share this post: digg it | bookmark it | live it | email it
Published Thursday, June 08, 2006 9:49 AM by gretchen
Filed Under: ,

Comments

 

Heather said:

You know it's HR Magazine in the UK, right?
June 8, 2006 4:54 PM
 

gretchen said:

Yes, I know.  But they also list a lot of American people, too.  And they didn't say their list only applied to Brits. :)
June 8, 2006 5:48 PM
 

Gerry Crispin said:

Hmmm. Not sure about your "influentials" unless there is a vaccine in the works.

My inspiration comes from listening to people like you doing what it takes to make something work at the ground level. Sometimes though, as in the case of Ulrich who was voted #1, they CAN make links between their 20,000 foot vision and the folks in the trenches. There are very few Ulrichs. Most often, at least in my book the influential HR leaders are the folks willing to stick their necks out (before they get visible enough to realize that it, their neck that is, isn't actually at risk). Lets have a vote on those folks. Most others, including me simply observe the obvious. And, I'm definitely not sure that the Covey's of the world should be included among the most influential HR blokes despite their obvious contributions. Says a lot about the mindset  of the voters however.

Methinks the real culprit - as so aptly expressed long ago by Pogo: "We have met the enemy and (s)he is us". It is too easy for staffing folks to deny being a part of HR simply because some of the practitioners we may have met or been negatively impacted by are fixed as stereotypes. HR was originally developed as a means to find manage and retain people. We may just be getting back to those basic but, that does mean, by definition, the we are HR. Some of us just don't know it. When we stand up and fight for a version of HR that properly reflects our mission by acknowledging the real practitioners who make the difference to Staffing, Managing and Retaining, we'll be there.
June 13, 2006 3:02 PM
New Comments to this post are disabled
Privacy Policy Terms and Conditions