Welcome to JobSyntax Sign in | Join | Help
Search
in

when recruiters google: do applicants have rights?

Gretchen

Yet another article on how "MySpace and Facebook can override your resume” (as digg puts it):   For Some, Online Persona Undermines a Resume 

This article quotes my former manager, Warren Ashton, as saying Microsoft “recruiters are given broad latitude over how to work, and there is no formal policy about using the Internet to research applicants.”  The same is true for most other companies as well.

I predict within the next year we’ll see the first discrimination lawsuit related to recruiters' online research of applicants. (Not against MS ... just in general.)  Now, whether or not an applicant has a valid case against an employer is another question, but as the researching of public information on the internet becomes more and more common by recruiters (and the resulting information enters into hiring decisions), real guidelines may arise. 

A few weeks ago, I offered a few tips on how to find and combat your digital dirtTod left a comment saying he had found another Tod Hilton (one “d”) who also worked in IT.  Hopefully, Tod's doppleganger is mild mannered, but it’s these types of identity confusions that I think will lead to more structured (or at least, transparent) internet discovery in the future. 

gretchen

P.S.  Congrats to Jen and Patrick (yeah, you probably don't know them) who just got engaged ... and to Scoble who just took a new job!

today's emotion:  lazy

Share this post: digg it | bookmark it | live it | email it
Published Sunday, June 11, 2006 5:27 PM by gretchen
Filed Under: , ,

Comments

 

Jeff Parker said:

This one has always Bothered me. I have a very common name. I remember once when I was 21 a newspaper clip found itself posted on our company bulliten board. While it was in humor and I laughed at it and even took it to my mother to laugh at. From the same city I am from there was a Jeff O. Parker arrested for armed robbery age 21. While I am Jeff D. Parker it was at the time funny now I am much older and this name many times has caused confusion I have had bills mixed up with other Jeff Parker's in the same town. Heck my phone books lists 5 of them and I am unlisted. Luckily most google searches on myself turn up others that are Doctors and Lawyers several who are computer programmers like myself.  However to combat the web and all the others who share my name is a daunting task. Who knows what a recruiter may turn up that just isn't me.
June 12, 2006 9:45 AM
 

tod hilton said:

lol - I tried to contact my 'doppleganger' by email shortly after I found his site, but no response yet.

As far as combating digital dirt, I have considered adding a new section to my "About" page. Something to the effect of "These aren't me" which lists websites or online articles I've found that call out my name, but are referencing a different Tod Hilton. It's not an end all solution, but might help to mitigate any negative effects. [shrug]
June 12, 2006 11:06 AM
 

Zoe said:

Identity confusion has always been an issue, but never as much as it is in the internet age.  Especially for the reckless who believe everthing they read online and don't engage in proper fact checking (another art which seems hopelessly lost in the days of blogs).  There are lot's of potential "doubles" out there even with seeminly unique names.  Take Mr. Zoe for example.  You'd think that his name was super unique, but he actually has a cousin by the same name and has been mistaken taken into custody (ahem) because of mistaken identity.  It's crazy and though you have a duty to yourself to be aware of these possibilities the people googling you also have to be extra aware of this as a potential problem.
June 12, 2006 12:04 PM
 

Shannon Seery said:

Hi Gretchen & Zoe:

I just wrote a post on this exact topic on our EXCELER8ion Blog today.  This is a highly complicated topic, but I agree that I expect to see a lawsuit in the near future.  Job seekers should have rights when recruiters take this material out of context to make hiring decisions.  MySpace is not supposed to be a resume, a "hire me" online brochure or necessarily representative of them as an employee.  

What is on MySpace is “public”, but I would also counter that the information isn’t public for the world to see whether they want to see it or not.  People are not flaunting the info in the face of their prospective employer – this is not the image that they are going to their interview with.  Employers have to SEARCH and go DIGGING for this information.  This feels wrong.

We’re not talking about people who have openly deceived a prospective employer and lied on their resume or covered up an arrest. We are talking about people that are just out there honestly talking about their life for social interaction and entertainment.
June 14, 2006 9:17 PM
 

Zoe said:

Hey Shannon - Thanks for your thoughts.  I couldn't agree with you more that you have really dig to find this information and at that point, you are probably crossing the line.  I think you have to be extremely carefully if you google people and remember to take what you see with a grain of salt.  It could be the wrong person or it could be just TMI that isn't relevant to whether or not a person can do the job.
June 18, 2006 9:05 PM
 

The JobSyntax Blog said:


Here's an interesting perspective on recruiting from Scoble.  Especially with Gret's recent...
June 19, 2006 8:34 AM
 

The JobSyntax Blog said:


Just read on Digg that you can hire a company to help you find and expunge your naughty...
November 7, 2006 4:29 PM
New Comments to this post are disabled
Privacy Policy Terms and Conditions