Welcome to JobSyntax Sign in | Join | Help
Search
in

no rpo here

Gretchen PowerPuff Girls courtesy of Warner Brothers

Over on the Recruiting Animal blogroll, the Canadian Headhunter categorizes our blog as a “RPO” blog.  RPO stands for Recruiting Process Outsourcing.  I noticed that CH categorized us this way a while back, but I’ve been too busy to tell him he’s wrong.  So, Michael, you’re wrong. ;-)

A RPO company - just as any outsourcing model company – takes a piece of your business (in this case, recruiting) and does it for you.  RPOs may just do your candidate sourcing; they may just do your interviewing; they may just do your offer presentations … or they may do the whole package for you.

Zoë and I have no problem with RPO companies and the employers who utilize their services.  It can be a fine arrangement if a company doesn’t have a recruiting department and needs someone else to do the work for them.  That’s not what we do though.

We’ve always felt that the software engineering business – especially the last few years with the continued rise of virtual and in-person developer communities – was a bit of a different beast.  The need for recruiters – whether in-house or outsourced – will and should never go away.  But since the social dynamics of the software industry are unique, we strongly believe that the employers who will be most successful in their hiring endeavors during the next decade will be those who put their technical employees on the front lines to get down and dirty in the recruiting process.  From what we’ve seen, Google is living this mantra the most these days, but other smaller companies are catching on fast, too.  It’s time to watch out.

I was researching RPO companies, and I ran across one company that loudly exclaims on their website:

Concentrate on your core competency.  Our core competency is recruiting top talent quickly and effectively.

Ok, fine.  That’s cool.  But we believe that attracting and hiring top talent should be among a company’s core competencies, shouldn't it?  That competency is too important to off-load it to someone else.  We created this company to help instill that competency and belief in all employees and teach them how to help their recruiting department, RPO, or co-workers to recruit the talent even more quickly and effectively.

As a stark contrast to the RPO’s statement discussed above, let’s take the example of Microsoft.  This is a company who has always instilled a strong “recruiting religion” in its employees. Just a few months ago, Fortune printed: 

What does Microsoft run on, if not financial capital? A clue: Ask executives what the company's core competency is, and they don't say a thing about software. They say hiring.

Yes, hiring.  Each and every employee is required to be a recruiter.  Now, I do think Microsoft’s employee recruiting skills have slipped in the last PowerPuff Girls courtesy of Warner Brothers few years (they need  a refresher course to keep up with the changing market, that’s all), but their passion for recruiting the stars of tomorrow is still there.

So, call us what you will, but don’t call us a RPO company. ;-)  Maybe we are a RPS … a Recruiting Process Supplement company.    Or maybe a SETME … a Software Engineering Talent Magnet Enabler company.  Ooh, I like that.    
 
Seth Godin says you shouldn’t necessarily try to fit yourself into an existing category and sometimes it’s ok to have a category all to yourself.  You just need to "pick your category and live and breathe and act appropriately for that category.”  We agree and have always tried to stick by that rule.   So with that in mind, here’s our new category:  Two really cool chicks who "get" software engineering recruitment and will blow your mind with our crazy mad skillz.  Whatcha think? ;-)

Happy Friday!

gretchen

Share this post: digg it | bookmark it | live it | email it
Published Friday, July 14, 2006 8:28 AM by gretchen
Filed Under: , ,

Comments

 

tod hilton said:

"Two really cool chicks who "get" software engineering recruitment and will blow your mind with our crazy mad skillz." - Spot on! :)

"Now, I do think Microsoft’s employee recruiting skills have slipped in the last  few years" - Here I am participating in the big, bad, bodacious, bonfire of the recruiting vanities blog swap and you diss me like that...I'm hurt. ;-)  

In all honesty, my response to that would be that employees do have a responsibility to represent their company and their actions in public often reflect on their employer. But, and you knew it was coming, I'm a technical guy...not a recruiter! I don't want to spend x% of my time specifically 'recruiting.' Yuck.
July 14, 2006 9:45 AM
 

gretchen said:

Ah, don't be hurt!  That statement doesn't apply to everyone, Tod. ;-)

And I'm not suggesting employees should spend x% of their time recruiting as much as they should incorporate recruiting into all aspects of their job.  I do think most MS employees do that ... you included.  But when I started at Microsoft in 2000, the hiring landscape was very different than it is today, and recruiting wasn't as complex as it is now. With all the online communities and additional information streams, a company's ability to impact the candidate pool (and get lost in the flood) has totally shifted.  That's what I'm talking about.  I don't think a lot of technical employees understand how to "play" that shift to make recruiting all that much easier.  That's all I'm saying. :)  <And again for the record, I think you do.> :)
July 14, 2006 12:15 PM
 

tod hilton said:

Ok, I've quit crying now. :)

I agree that the recruiting environment has changed. When I posted our SDET opening on my blog I received interest from some very good/qualified people. I don't know if that happened back in 2000, but I think it definitely reflects a change in the environment...one for the better I might add.

What an awesome opportunity for anyone interested in working for a specific group. All they have to do is regularly read the team's blogs (individual, team & product oriented) (like the Scooblog for example) and then if they see an opening posted they have the option to get in direct touch with that team/person.  Not too mention by having read the blog(s) they have an inside track to that person/team's personality which can make the recruiting/interview process go much smoother. Hmm, perhaps that might be a good blogswap topic. ;-)
July 14, 2006 12:55 PM
New Comments to this post are disabled
Privacy Policy Terms and Conditions