Welcome to JobSyntax Sign in | Join | Help
Search
in

resume 2.0: is personal brand the new calling card?

Zoe

I guess you could say there’s been some buzz lately about “personal branding”; the idea that communicating a “brand of you” to employers is potentially more helpful, and in some ways more telling, then the simple resume you write.

Now I am all about the idea of building a personal brand, but there are plenty more people out there that have already told it like it is in blogs and articles.  Like this thoughtful post from Krista Bradford, head of a leading executive research firm.  Or this one from Robert Scoble and Shel Israel on Naked Conversations.  Then there is Ola Rynge in Sweden whose whole blog is dedicated to personal branding. 

What’s interesting though is that the idea of personal brand isn’t new (check out this article on building a personal brand from Fast Company dating back to August 1997).  What is new is that people are starting to actually use personal brand to differentiate themselves in a market flooded with top talent and that there is a whole industry dedicated to helping you build that brand.

Since software engineers get a bad wrap for being social introverts, I wonder if personal brand is even something that you folks think about.  Are you out there building a personal brand and if so what is it?  Do you even think it is something that is important?  Or is this just another fancy buzz word that won’t go very far?

Share this post: digg it | bookmark it | live it | email it
Published Tuesday, August 08, 2006 2:49 PM by Zoe
Filed Under: ,

Comments

 

Russ Moon said:

Personal Brand - It is real and is more telling than your resume.
This isn't even a dialogue, like saying "the Earth is round."
August 8, 2006 9:15 PM
 

tod hilton said:

I definitely think about this. As I've said in the blog swap, every single time I hit "submit" I try to think of the affect this could/will have. I don't always do the right thing, but I'm certainly aware of the potential consequences.
August 9, 2006 10:48 AM
 

shel israel said:

I'm not sure how far back the concept of personal brand goes, but it's been around at least since the late 80s when some ad mavens were using it.  The difference is that we now have the interactice web and social media such as blogging, so that a lot more people can proactively contribute a lot more to the public eye.  Getting a job because of personal brand is one aspect, but your personal brand helps you in a great many business and personalways.  Before you have a business meeting with someone new, you can learn a great deal about them, and they can do the same regarding you.  
August 9, 2006 11:26 AM
 

Zoe said:

Russ - completely agree with you there, no debate from my end.  The question I think I have more then anything else is whether or not this is something that the mainsteam understand or if it is something that we use in the "industry".

Tod - thanks for that insight.  Do you think that Software Engineers and people building new technologies develop their brand on a conscious level?  Or again is this just something that we in the "industry" use as a descriptor and is just organic for the mainstream.  I mean, do folks think when they work on something - "hey man, I think this will help my personal brand".

Shel - I totally agree.  I would think the concept, but not the buzzword goes a lot father back as you mentioned in the post I linked to.  I think about politicians in the 1800's and they had to build a "personal brand" to garner attention from the masses through the media, or musical celebrities like Elvis or the Beatles, pr more recently N'Sync, that have built entire brands around themselves and then there are sports stars that have huge endorsements because of there public personas.  
August 9, 2006 11:59 AM
 

gretchen said:

Shel's comment makes me think of something I used to do at Microsoft before meetings with people I didn't know.  I'd look them up in the Global Address Book ... not to see where they worked and who they reported to ... but to see which aliases they belonged to.  From their email group membership, I could learn a lot about a person's interests and background, and those data points would help me adjust how I approached the person.  So I guess you can find out about personal brand lots of places.

The way I see it in recruiting is that, generally, the resume is still  the "calling card" that gets you in the door, but the personal brand is what keeps you in (or kicks you out of) the house.  For most people who don't have a clearly apparent personal brand (like fame), it's supporting evidence.
August 9, 2006 12:05 PM
 

Simon Wakeman - Managing your personal brand said:

August 24, 2006 2:04 AM
 

Ola Rynge said:

I think what Shel is saying is an important aspect of personal branding. It has been used for a long time to shape up resumes and in career planning. A relatively new way of looking on personal branding is the personal development part, where really getting to know yourself and learn to communicate your core values in a clear and conscious matter is more essential than boosting your resume.
August 27, 2006 3:46 PM
 

Zoe said:

That's a really great point Ola.  I think about the industry segment I work with and wonder if this is something, that is getting to know themselves and clearly communicate their values, they do on a consistent and conscious basis.
August 27, 2006 4:27 PM
 

Ola Rynge said:

As an employer, I certanly wouldn't want a boosted resume. I would like a strong candidate that can communicate who she really is and feeling secure in that her core values matches the culture of my company.
Even if the boosted resume is a reflection of the strenghts of the candidate, I got the feeling that it will not help communicating the cultural skills (eg. group belongings) of the person. If on the other hand, the strenghts has risen from her core values that she has discoverd while working with her personal brand (or other personal development techniques), it would mean a lot more to me as an employer.

Another aspect is what you are writing about Zoe. Why should this only be part of the recruiting process? The people that need it most are probably middle and top level management. They need to be clear and consistent in their messages to the employees, and it is important that the employees get the feeling that all the management share the same core values.
August 28, 2006 5:23 PM
 

Zoe said:

Wow Ola - this is an interesting comment given that we never, ever recommend "boosting" a resume and our services our directed toward helping individuals articulate a clear message.  I certainly don't say or indicate that personal branding is only something that should be reserved for the recruiting realm.  
August 28, 2006 7:10 PM
 

Ola Rynge said:

I am sorry Zoe, the post was not directed to your organization, but rather as a reflection on how personal branding has been (and still is being) mistreated in general.
I am really sorry for not being clear about that. As a matter of fact I think that you seem to have some great views on recruiting and personal branding. Otherwise, I would not be writing here. :)
August 29, 2006 2:14 AM
 

Zoe said:

Thanks for clarifying Ola!  :)
August 29, 2006 9:40 AM
 

JibberJobber Blog » Blog Archive » Introductions gone bad… said:

January 11, 2007 10:54 AM
 

http://jobsyntax.com/blogs/jobgals/archive/2006/08/08/480.aspx said:

March 25, 2008 3:24 AM
New Comments to this post are disabled
Privacy Policy Terms and Conditions