Welcome to JobSyntax Sign in | Join | Help
Search
in

yahoo! agrees ... it's not about the length. it's how you use it.

GretchenWell, at least their Chief People Yahoo!, Libby Sartain, thinks like we do.  Guy's having "HR and recruiting week" on his blog, and today he talks to Libby about recruiting at Yahoo!  Some really great stuff.  She even pushes the edge of recruiting transparency and provides source of hire percentages. (Applying through the Yahoo! career page and being referred by an employee accounts for 60% of the company's hires.)  These numbers aren't anything unusual, but you won't find many companies releasing those results externally.  Good for her.

Anyway, Guy does ask Libby about resume length.  I know you anticipate the answer with bated-breath ...

Question: Does a resume that’s over one page long hurt a candidate’s chances?

Answer: We are looking at resumes electronically, so the pages aren’t really the issue. They should be succinct, but if they are two pages, or three pages...and great, that works. Anything over three pages is too much.

Of course, Guy wasn't happy with that response. "God help us, Libby is unleashing three-page resumes on us," he writes.  But as Zoe just IM-ed me, "You can write a one page resume that sucks ***." True dat.

It's not about the length ... it's how you use it.  ;-)

In other but still related news, Guy offers to write Justice Gray's one-page resume for him.   Can't wait to read about the result.

gretchen

Share this post: digg it | bookmark it | live it | email it
Published Wednesday, August 16, 2006 4:05 PM by gretchen
Filed Under: ,

Comments

 

Saurabh Garg said:

Yahoo! has a distinct "secrecy" about its recruitment structure. Or, maybe, no one really wants to dig deeper into their HR practices. In contrast, we know a lot about how hiring works at companies like Google and Microsoft. That 10:1 applicant to jobs ratio is pretty darn good in my opinion for an Internet business like Yahoo!

The statistic about referral hires made me think - What's the comparable statistic at Microsoft? Does the bias for certain college alumni work a lot in these cases?

August 17, 2006 3:51 AM
 

gretchen said:

Hi Saurabh - Well, it's not clear.  Libby says, "we see about 10 for every job."  She makes that sounds like 10 resumes, but that could be an interview to hire ratio.   And if it is, does she mean phone interview / initial screening interview ... or does she mean final, on-site interview?  She doesn't specify, and I'm a little confused at what she's getting at.  Seeing 10 qualified applicants per position coming through the website application source does seem *really* good though.  Hmmm.

Referrals are definitely the highest source of hire for Microsoft, as for other similar companies I would expect.  Of course, my NDA tells me I can't tell you how high that is. ;-) It's not really a conscious bias though.  I think referrals have an easier time getting hired because 1) they have a friend on the inside who can typically get their resume to a real person as well as provide them useful tips and tricks, and 2) companies, whether they admit or not, typically hire a certain profile .... Referrals are often cut from the same cloth as the employee so they more easily fit into the mold.  

If you want to get hired into a certain company, you should always work your networks of past school mates, co-workers, etc.  It's the most direct route from A to B.

August 17, 2006 11:00 AM
New Comments to this post are disabled
Privacy Policy Terms and Conditions