Welcome to JobSyntax Sign in | Join | Help
Search
in

best (and worst) of the blog business summit

Zoe

As you may have read here, last Thursday and Friday we attended the Blog Business Summit (BBS).  I decided not to live blog it or publish daily dispatches largely because other folks were doing such a great job of that, but also because I like to have some time to digest material prior to actually commenting on it.  Sometimes I think that something is really awesome or totally stinks and then a few days later I find myself revising my opinion.

In any case, I truly enjoyed my time at BBS.  There were some crazy interesting people there and everyone was willing to have a free exchange of ideas, talk through some interesting scenarios and get to know each other.  Here are some of my impressions...

Highlights

  • Getting a chance to catch up with Robert and Maryam.  They seemed so happy and were very cute vibing off each other during their “10 Way to a Killer Blog” presentation.
  • Meeting and having really interesting conversations with Jory Des Jardins from BlogHer, Ariel Stallings from Jobster and Randy Stewart.  I was hoping to get a chance to talk with Karen Wickre from Google and Nicki Dugan from Yahoo! since they are both running corporate blogs (our passion) but, alas, we did not connect.  Maybe offline? :0)
  • Ben Edwards from IBM and his keynote on "Branding in the Age of YouTube" and his erudite comment that how we use social media to interact is fundamentally changing the way that we create, share and respond to information.
  • Elisa Camahort who, during the "Building Online Communities" session, made the comment that growing a community is about speaking, listening and responding.  Right on.
  • Jason Calacanis telling us during his keynote that if "you are not on the blogging A-list you suck".  Dude, it's all in how you define A-list.
  • Huge props to the BBS team! You did an amazing job organizing this event and from my view point it seemed to run without a hitch.   
  • The food was choice.  There was a very hefty continental breakfast, snacks mid-morning, lunch, and mid-afternoon snacks as well.  Also a steady supply of drinks and a variety of choices for those who were vegetarians.  Not to mention that the cocktail hour nibblets on Thursday were plenty for a whole meal.  Yum!

Lowlights

  • I would have liked to have seen two separate tracks at the conference.  One for beginning bloggers and another for more experienced individuals.  Often times I found myself sitting through a session even though it wasn’t that relevant.
  • Though many of the presentation titles and descriptions were very pertinent, I found that often times presenters seemed to be less organized and speaking very informally or on the fly about their topics.  In some cases, it wasn’t until someone from the audience asked a question (e.g. so how do you build an online community?), that the topic was actually covered.  Unfortunately, this was usually within the last 10 minutes of the session.
  • To that end, I’m used to seeing fairly formal presentations of the type that Ben Edwards, Scoble and John Batelle gave.  They were prepared, focused and on topic.  I got way more out of these sessions then some of the others we went to.
  • More variety in the presenters.  The same people seemed to present over and over again and while I have a deep respect for these people, I would loved to hear more from folks in different industry or with different experience.

Suprises

  • Interesting to see that many of the attendees were there to determine how blogging could enhance their business and, to that end, put a strategy around using this form of “new media”.  Why is this surprising?  Because I view blogging as such a grass-roots effort that defies the traditional definitions and metrics that marketing often places on such initiatives.  Blogging is now part of a larger scope of this thing called new media which has it’s roots in social networking and transparency and a whole business is now spawning from this “industry”. 
  • That there is actually an established (well, pretty much) industry around new media, new marketing, commercial social media, and emerging media.  I have A LOT to say about this, more then this post can take... 

Silly Gripes

  • Three words people.  Cell.  Phone.  Etiquette.  It didn’t matter that there were copious announcements requesting people to silence, or dare I say it, shut off your phone.  Nor did it seem to trigger any reminders when fellow attendees blogged to no end about annoying cell phones going off during presentations.  People still managed to leave their phones on.  My favorite was the triumphant circus chorus that rung out during one of the keynotes.  Priceless.
  • Two words people.  Notebook.  Etiquette.  Okay, maybe I shouldn’t so much complain about this, but I actually found it really quite distracting (disclosure; I didn’t bring mine because it’s broken).  I know it’s your perogative to determine if you are going to pay attention during a conference or use your notebook to take notes, but dude, there were some points during the presentation where I could barely hear the presenter over the din of people slamming away on their keyboards.  The more interesting the presenter?  The less keyboard noise.  I have only one conclusion to draw there…

 

 

Share this post: digg it | bookmark it | live it | email it
Published Monday, October 30, 2006 8:17 PM by Zoe
Filed Under: ,

Comments

 

Blog Business Summit Thoughts » Personal Insights on Web 2.0, Blogging, and Business said:

October 30, 2006 10:42 PM
 

gretchen said:

Great review.  Here's what I just said in my feedback form for BBS.  Several of the same themes:

What worked especially well for us this time? What did you like about the event?

Very well organized ... and great food!

Inspiring and crazy smart group of attendees and presenters who are the true leaders of new media

The networking opportunities (again because of the high caliber attendees) were fantastic.

This was certainly one of the best conferences I’ve attended.


Where could we improve? What did NOT work so well this time?

Since you ask . . .

1) Diversity of thought:

a) More industries -  So many organizations and individuals are successfully using new media in their businesses; however, the attendees (or at least the presenters we heard from) mainly represented the technical sector.  Expanding the type of businesses and verticals represented would make the conference that much more rich.

b)  Fewer repeat presenters -   Again, the group of attendees was phenomenal ... but why have the same group of people (who are definitely accomplished - but look at all those great attendees you had, too!) present repeatedly?  I understand that a conference strives to make money and the more presenters you invite the more free admissions you give away, but there are a few ways around this.  First, fewer panels.  It's fine (and even very engrossing) to have one presenter talk for a full hour.  Secondly, break-outs / birds of a feather.  With the wealth of knowledge represented at the conference, it would have been fun to have an afternoon of 30 minute BOFs … and that way you get more people “presenting” for free … and increase networking opportunities. :)

2) Tracks – The conference seem split between newbies learning how new media could enhance their businesses and pioneers who had already successfully launched new media in their own businesses.  I think I attended 3 sessions which focused on how to search for key words using Technorati; this type of topic, while relevant and worth a mention, didn’t need to be repeatedly presented for those who have been blogging for a while. I gleaned the most from more advanced sessions Tris and Andru's Audience Measurement talk, Ben Edward's Branding in the Age of YouTube, and Scoble, Andru, and Mary's Podcasting presentation.  (Likewise, there were several people there who were blog consultants versus in-house marketers … and big business versus small business.  Lots of opportunity for tracks as you grow.)

3)  Prepare.  Prepare.  Prepare.  With the exception of a few presenters like Scoble, Jason Calacanis, and Ben Edwards, most presenters were entirely unprepared.  (My rating of presenters largely hinges on their level of apparent preparation.)  As an attendee who was there for some serious learning, I frankly found the laissez-faire approach by many presenters insulting.  And it’s not ok to blog while *giving* a presentation.  Maybe I’m old school but I expect PowerPoints and preparation.  Or, back to the idea above, BOF sessions in which we can all pontificate and blog. :)

4)  Stay focused.  Again, probably a result of lack of preparation, but most of the "panels" I attended barely touched on their intended topic until the audience questions at the very end.  I felt as though many presenters had not read the description of their topic as closely as the attendees had! :)

And in the spirit of transparency, I’ve also blogged this. :) Again, I really did think this was a great conference!

October 30, 2006 11:17 PM
 

Jason said:

I did not say that if you're not on the A-list you suck. I said that if you can't get traffic and you're complaining that the A-list (which doesn't exist in my mind) is blocking you that it's that your content prob. sucks.

i also pointed out there is no A-list... and that anyone could get on the "a-list" by going to techmeme daily and writing about the top story. there is no A-list in blogging...
October 31, 2006 1:33 PM
 

Zoe said:

Thanks for coming on and providing some clarification on this particular comment from your keynote!  I do want to say that I agree with you though.  It is your responsibility to generate traffic to your site and create your own community.  When I say "it's all in how you define the A-list" I mean that I agree that there is no "THE A-LIST".  Different verticles and different markets all have their experts.  If it's important for you to be an expert in your field and build a community then you need to take responsibility for creating that energy around your blog.  So essentially if you are complaining that you are not getting recognized for the work that you do, the ball is in your court to fix it.

Anyway, appreciate you dropping by...

October 31, 2006 3:09 PM
 

Nicki Dugan said:

Sorry we missed each other at the conference. Our nanny was on vacation last week (perrrfectly timed) so my networking time was cut short by dealing with drop-off/pick-up with babysitters in farflung places. Bummed I missed Thursday's cocktail hour(s) especially. Drop me a line at nicki at yahoo-inc dot com any time.
November 1, 2006 11:57 PM
 

Zoe said:

I am so glad that you dropped by!  I'll definitely touch base with you in email in the next few days...
November 2, 2006 2:15 PM
 

tod hilton said:

RE:  Jason Calacanis telling us during his keynote that if "you are not on the blogging A-list you suck"

A highlight?  I certainly hope he was being sarcastic.  
November 3, 2006 4:02 PM
 

Zoe said:

Yeah - a highlight in the sense of his clarification and my response above.  I actually agree with him in part.  The message got blurred a bit because many folks interpreted it as - "you suck", but I get his point.  Just funny hearing people say stuff like this at conferences.
November 3, 2006 5:30 PM
 

tod hilton said:

D'oh, I totally missed his comment when making mine. In that case, I agree with him...there really isn't an A-list.  Thanks for pointing out my lack of reading skills. :)
November 3, 2006 6:13 PM
New Comments to this post are disabled
Privacy Policy Terms and Conditions